War on Freedom

New gun bill is patently unconstitutional!

on . Posted in War on Freedom

WASHINGTON (PNN) - December 27, 2018 - I have a legislative alert for SurvivalBlog readers: H.R. 7115, the 3D Firearms Prohibition Act, is on its face perhaps one of the most unconstitutional laws ever written. It is sponsored by Congressman Frank Pallone, Jr., (N.J.). It will most likely be reintroduced in the 116th Congress.

This proposed law, introduced on November 2, 2018, is purported to ban 3D printed guns. But it is actually about milling (subtractive) technology rather than 3D printing (additive) technology. I have news for Mr. Pallone: All guns are 3D, once they are off the drawing board.

Pallone’s bill goes far beyond milling machine processes. It would ban firearms parts kits, ban electronic publishing about 80% of the receivers offered for sale, require the owners of receiver blanks to beg the issuance of a serial number before then can be milled, and even retroactively ban unserialized receivers that have been made since 1968. It also arbitrarily sets a 90-day limit for number stamping/engraving and completion of the receiver. You can read the full text of the bill here.

The summary preamble to H.R. 7115 reads: To prohibit the sale, acquisition, distribution in commerce, or import into the (Fascist Police States of Amerika) of certain firearm receiver castings or blanks, assault weapon parts kits, and machine gun parts kits and the marketing or advertising of such castings or blanks and kits on any medium of electronic communications, to require homemade firearms to have serial numbers, and for other purposes.

But even a cursory reading of Pallone’s bill shows that it is blatantly unconstitutional, in many ways. Here are a few:

  • The proposed law violates the First Amendment by making it illegal to communicate to others about the availability of certain gun parts.
  • The proposed law violates the Second Amendment. If anything, battle rifles deserve the strongest protection of the Second Amendment, since those are the guns most suitable for use by the citizen militia. But Pallone’s law focuses on them and their component parts as a supposed “banned hazardous product”.
  • The proposed law violates the Fourth Amendment because it eliminates the inherent privacy of citizens in assembling guns from parts of their own manufacture or that have no bearing on interstate commerce. It also violates our privacy by forcing us to beg for serial number from Federal Firearms License holders assignments for already legally possessed guns.
  • The proposed law violates the Fifth Amendment by requiring the owners of post-1968 unserialized privately made guns (or receivers, or receiver blanks, or parts sets) to report themselves to fascist federal authorities, possibly incriminating themselves.
  • The proposed law also violates the Fifth Amendment’s “Takings” clause, because it bans “certain firearm receiver castings or blanks, assault weapon parts kits, and machine gun parts kits” without leaving any viable market. It is a ban without compensation.
  • The proposed law exceeds the mandate of the Commerce Clause (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the FPSA Constitution) by creating new over-reaching federal authority on 50-year-old gun receivers and other gun parts that can date back more than 100 years. These parts clearly have long been out of Interstate Commerce and thus have no federal nexus whatsoever. (That is private intrastate commerce.)
  • The proposed law violates the Ex Post Facto Law Clause by retroactively creating the crime of owning a post-1968 unserialized firearm receiver. This is a gross violation of Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, of the FPSA Constitution. That clause prohibits the enactment of ex post facto laws.
  • The proposed law is also void for vagueness. According to the Cornell Law School web site, this is “a constitutional rule that requires criminal laws to state explicitly and definitely what conduct is punishable. Criminal laws that violate this requirement are said to be void for vagueness. Vagueness doctrine rests on the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the (FPSA) Constitution. By requiring fair notice of what is punishable and what is not, vagueness doctrine also helps prevent arbitrary enforcement of the laws.” In this instance the law bans “parts sets” without properly defining how many parts constitutes a “set”. The law is also horribly vague in that it does not define what percentage of completion constitutes a “receiver blank”. Is it 80%? It doesn’t say. Nor does it define what percentage constitutes a completed “receiver”. Is that 81%? Or 90%? Or 99%? Or 100%? Again, it is quite vaguely written.

All in all, this proposed law is grossly unconstitutional on several levels and in several respects.  Under the traditions and standards of Amerikan jurisprudence, we are not bound to obey this law, and it cannot be enforced. (Lex Mala, Lex Nulla) It is null and void, even before passage.

This bill will get a new number when it is re-introduced. Be forewarned that it may be slipped into a large legislative package, such as an omnibus funding bill. Please contact your Congressman and Senator to mention this particular legislation. While you are at it, remind them that “universal background checks” is a gun-grabbers’ code phrase for “banning private party sales.” Also, be sure to mention: I oppose any and all new gun laws and Red Flag laws.

This article is attributed to James Wesley, Rawles and SurvivalBlog.

Eulogies

Eulogy for an Angel
1992-Dec. 20, 2005

My Father
1918-2010

brents dad

Dr. Stan Dale
1929-2007

stan dale

A. Solzhenitsyn
1918-2008

solzhenitsyn

Patrick McGoohan
1928-2009

mcgoohan

Joseph A. Stack
1956-2010

Bill Walsh
1931-2007

Walter Cronkite
1916-2009

Eustace Mullins
1923-2010

Paul Harvey
1918-2009

Don Harkins
1963-2009

Joan Veon
1949-2010

David Nolan
1943-2010

Derry Brownfield
1932-2011

Leroy Schweitzer
1938-2011

Vaclav Havel
1936-2011

Andrew Breitbart
1969-2012

Dick Clark
1929-2012

Bob Chapman
1935-2012

Ray Bradbury
1920-2012

Tommy Cryer
1949-2012

Andy Griffith
1926-2012

Phyllis Diller
1917-2012

Larry Dever
1926-2012

Brian J. Chapman
1975-2012

Annette Funnicello
1942-2012

Margaret Thatcher
1925-2012

Richie Havens
1941-2013

Jack McLamb
1944-2014

James Traficant
1941-2014

jim traficant

Dr. Stan Monteith
1929-2014

stan montieth

Leonard Nimoy
1931-2015

Leonard Nimoy

Stan Solomon
1944-2015

Stan Solomon

B. B. King
1926-2015

BB King

Irwin Schiff
1928-2015

Irwin Schiff

DAVID BOWIE
1947-2016

David Bowie

Muhammad Ali
1942-2016

Muhammed Ali

GENE WILDER
1933-2016

gene wilder

phyllis schlafly
1924-2016

phylis schafly

John Glenn
1921-2016

John Glenn

Charles Weisman
1954-2016

Charles Weisman

Carrie Fisher
1956-2016

Carrie Fisher

Debbie Reynolds
1932-2016

Debbie Reynolds

Roger Moore
1917-2017

Roger Moore

Adam West
1928-2017

Adam West

JERRY LEWIS
1926-2017

jerry lewis

HUGH HEFNER
1926-2017

Hugh Hefner

PROF. STEPHEN HAWKING
1942-2018

Hugh Hefner 

ART BELL
1945-2018

Art Bell

DWIGHT CLARK
1947-2018

dwight clark

CARL MILLER
1952-2017

Carl Miller

HARLAN ELLISON
1934-2018

Harlan Ellison

STAN LEE
1922-2018

stan lee